The foundation of cherishs is critical to consider in atonic of the y asidehful terrorist flames on the United States. People base their pry sy chemical groups on 2 opposing linear aspects: unequivocal and non- out-and-out(a). The overbearing posture trip ups determine as an solely-encompassing universal standard of principles that survive freely of what individuals believe to be true and squirt be seen in the creed of Matthew. The non- infinite stance views value as a transformation standard of principles that are establish on a continu in ally changing context and give notice buoy buoy be seen in the basic writings of the Hsun Tzu. With an objective of securing two-eyed violet in the body politicly concern one of the two value systems must be woodland due to the fact that they contradict and thus crapper non both be as effective. If the foundation of values continues to be ground in arbitrary and non- controlling areaviews simultaneously thu s two-eyed violet leave behind be much less analogously to bring about because study will inevitably arise from the contrasting beliefs. The values based in an absolute position are the only ones qualified of securing peace in the terra firma, since they are the only ones that create a universal respect for fundamental hu human rights and freedoms.         In the basic writings of the Hsun Tzu the non-absolute perspective of values can be blow over seen. The first evidence of this perspective on values can be seen in the relationship between rite principles and the sage. The Hsun Tzu says ritual Principles ¦ are created by sages. (Watson p.158) This means that the ritual principles are not absolute true beliefs but ones inherited finished ancestors that were created by men and change over time. The Hsun Tzu goes on to say ritual principles are certainly not a part of mans determinate nature. (Watson p. 162) This is evidence of the lack of a belief in underlying absolute values that ! are originally built into mankind. other use of when the Hsun Tzu demonstrates its support of the non-absolute perspective can be seen in the view that humanitys nature is naturally chaotic and hectic and that governance must be imposed. If the Chinese creationview back up the view of absolute values it would believe absolute values already entrust order and that it would be un required to impose it. The Hsun Tzu reinforces this non-absolute worldview when it defines technical and swelled by whether or not something is hardheaded. If t present was an absolute worldview shaping good and bad and so whether of not it is pragmatic would merely be irrelevant, because it would be right or terms independent of individual views. Chinese thought as seen through the Hsun Tzu supports the non-absolute perspective on values.         In opposition to the Chinese perspective on values is the absolute value perspective as seen in Christianity, specifically in the credo of Matthew. In the Gospel delivery boy teaches a worldview that strongly espouses absolute values. show of this can be seen when in his teaching about the Law, he says Remember that as long as heaven and earth last, not the least(prenominal) point nor the smallest detail of the Law will be make away with ? not until the end of all things. (Metzger and Meruphy 5:18) savior here is showing that the Law, his system of values, is absolute and will ceaselessly exist exactly as it does and accordingly. His absolute worldview can too be seen when he discuss the teaching of the ancestors. here(predicate) savior tells the Pharisees that it is they who disobey Gods commands. (Metzger and Meruphy 15:1-9) The important point here is that the commands have it off from God, an absolute source. The Chinese worldview also believes values are give vote down from their ancestors (Watson p.158) but unlike Christianity it does not hold that the eventual(prenominal) source of these values is God. Absolutism is once over again! supported in Jesus par satisfactory The Two House Builders (Metzger and Meruphy 7:24-27). In this parable Jesus shows that those who follow his commands will be like one who builds his house on rock. This rock is a emblematic representation of his absolute system of values. The other man who builds his house on sand is like those who have a non-absolute value system, which can change and fluctuate bringing down the house. The Gospel of Matthew is evidence of Christianitys belief in an absolute perspective regarding values.         These two perspectives on values, absolute and non-absolute are in our world today, until now it is the absolute version that is more conducive to world peace. some(a) may not see this as so in light of the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11th, 2001 in in the altogether York urban center and the Pentagon.
They would argue that it is precisely because the terrorists had an absolute worldview that they did their heinous crime. This is true that they had an absolute perspective, but not necessarily the correct one. After all due to the fact that it is an absolute worldview only one can be correct and theirs was not. The world needs a universally accepted set of absolute values to insure that peace will exist. If there were no absolute values past any nation could decide, based on their circumstance, that it would be enunciate and pragmatic to attack their neighbor, and do so. If all nations did share an absolute worldview, one that unlike the terrorists respected fundamental human rights and freedoms, and then it would go a gainst the nations values to attack their neighbor an! d would therefore be conducive to peace. The only form of conflict or sputter that would occur would be those necessary to secure peace and wet-nurse the absolute values against those who failed to recognize them (such as the terrorists). These conflicts would be sizeable to ensuring peace. Those lacking an absolute standard of values would also not be capable of functioning fairly and objectively in the planetary community, which would create a more unstable and un-peaceful world. For usage if the members of the United Nations did not have common ground in their mutual acceptance of fundamental absolute values then they would have no way of functioning collectively to stomach through these values. Peacekeeping missions that fight aggression worldwide would be impossible.         Without a holding a perspective of absolute values world peace would be much more rough to ensure. The global community needs to recognize these values and the freedoms and r ights that stem from them. precisely then will the world be able to live safe knowing people will not, out of divergent values based on circumstance; attack their neighbors, disassemble their fundamental rights, and create war. Absolute values are necessary for absolute peace. Works Cited Watson, Burton. Hsun Tzu Basic Writings. NY, NY: Columbia University Press, 1996. Metzger, Bruce; Murphy, Roland. The New Oxford Annotated Bible. NY, NY: Oxford         University Press, 1994. If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment