How Technology Has Affected the Capabilities

IntroductionRecognizing the identity of a person is a study problem encountered by most of the evaluator and security systems, especially when an individual provides false information. Until recently, the methods of providing the true identity of whitlows take a leak been few and pr single to errors (Davis, Weiss, 2009). With the death penalty of modern computerized technologies, communication capabilities of narrow databases ( such as the fingerprint identifiers) have been make effective and accurate. In this paper, the effect of technology on the communication capabilities of specialised databases in felonious arbitrator will be analyzed, by examine the facial mention and iris scan techniques of credit and discussing the overall affirmative and negative effects of these technologies on deplorable umpire system.How technology has touch the capabilities of change databases in the lamentable justice systemIn trying to make their bleed easier and much effective, the justice and security personnel have always looked into the forward technological methods to enhance communication capabilities deep down the justice system. The introduction of bipartite radio and increased role of automobile have helped in astir(p) the effectiveness of communication databases and responding to guilty incidents (Seaskate Inc. 1998). Modern technology has introduced many methods of specialised databases which have become exceedingly useful in crime investigation and response to incidences.The specialized databases utilize computerized techniques to identify criminals or suspects as considerably as to facilitate communication between the police, the general public and amongst separate security personnel. The most use specialized databases by the security and justice system to provide identification of individuals include the Mobile Data Terminals, put up Scans, signal flag Scans, Facial information and the AFIS (Scherpenzeel, 2008). These technologies make i ndividual identification easier, more accurate and more effective in terms of time and cost. both police officers and prosecutors have in many occasions applied them in identifying, judging, imprisoning or even in releasing criminals (Reichert, 2001)Comparison between Facial Recognition and Iris ScanIris scan refers to a technique of biometric identification victimisation exalted tech actualization patterns which utilize images of a persons iris. Iris cameras ar utilise to perform stainings of an individuals identity using mathematical analysis of random patterns visible in the iris. The technique uses a combination of pattern credit, computer vision, optics and statistical inferences (Find biostatistics, n. d).Facial recognition technique on the other hand is a computerized application which identifies an individual from a boob tube outline or digital image. It is used in criminal justice systems to identify tidy sum by comparing the selected facial appearance from a speci fied facial database. This technique uses unalterable physical facial structures (say the spot between centers of an individuals pupils of the eye or the diameter of a persons eye balls) and through algorithm, finite computerized set of steps ar used to solve the problem, by translating the image into numerical values (Davis, Weiss, 2009).Iris scan is an intragroup detection method while the facial recognition is an external detection technique. Un ilk the iris scan which uses an internal organ of the carcass, the facial recognition technique is done using certain parts of an individual stage such jaws, cheekbones, nose or the eyes these features are applied in searching for images matching with them. Facial recognition has been criticized because it uses external parts of the body which are likely to change over time through ache exposure to manual work, use of facial cosmetics or plastic surgical procedure (Titanium, 2010).These changes can completely transform and individ uals physical appearance, thus making it hard to be identified from a crowd. However, the method has one merit the iris scan and other biometric methods lack it doesnt turn to for any help from the individual being testedif the system is correctly designed and effectively installed in places such as multiplexes and airports, it can considerably pick out the required subject from a crowd.For other biometric techniques such as the iris scan, speech recognition and fingerprints, the subject must be involved in the detection process and mass identification cannot accept (Titanium, 2010). Nonetheless, Iris scan is more reliable since it is not dependent on light or sight, exactly depends on the pattern of the iris. The facial recognition technique can fail due to poor lighting, long hair, use of sunglasses and other small resolution images and objects that relatively cover the position (Titanium, 2010).The overall positive and negative effects of the immature techniques on the cr iminal justice systemBasically, the youthfulfound technologies in the criminal justice and communication have greatly improved the way in which criminal identification and vestige is conducted by the justice and security systems. To begin with, specialized databases are used either complimentary or alternatively to ensure that accurate egresss are made. This implies that in one instance, both the facial recognition and fingerprints can be applied for the same specimen or subject when there are doubts or ambiguity regarding identity.This ensures that minimal errors occur, thus reducing the chances of wrong identification (Scherpenzeel, 2008). Furthermore, the new technologies have reduced the costs that used to be incurred in tracking down criminals. Such costs included travel costs, nonrecreational witnesses, interviewing individuals, costs of detaining many suspects before identifying the guilty criminal. More so, problems that used to be encountered due to physical transforma tion of an individual as a result of surgeries, injuries and use of cosmetics have now been overcome through the use of specialized databases like the speech recognition and iris scan biometrics (Scherpenzeel, 2008)..However, the new technologies have had a number of negative effects on the criminal justice system. The most common negative effect is the fact that this new technologies require a lot of professionalism and skill, not only in criminology, but also in statistics, mathematics and computer technology. However, many people do not possess this combined qualifications and this leads to shortage of personnel in the criminal investigation department.As such, the process of identification becomes slower since it is entrusted with few specialists who are cannot be able to handle all the cases presented to them. In some other cases, semi-skilled people have been entrusted the work, resulting to wrong identification or non identification (Reichert 2001). Other problems normally re sult from system breakdowns or corruption of system files which affect the lustiness of the results. Corruption of operating systems is mostly done by people within the criminal justice system who wish to obstruct certain criminal identification processes for personal reasons (Scherpenzeel, 2008).Since some of this technologies are still relatively new (such as the iris scan and live scan), most of the criminal justice systems find it too expensive to adopt them due to the high initial installation costs and therefore, they are rarely used. Other specialized databases like the facial scanner pose problems in places of installation such as railways and airports due to security factors. This has made it difficult for the justice system to continually use this technique in identifying wanted individuals (Reichert 2001).Preferred specialized databasesAmong all the types of specialized databases and biometric scanners and devices used for detection of identification today, the iris scan ner has proved to be most effective and accurate. This is because, an individuals iris cannot be prevent by contact lenses and glasses it can be accurately scanned from ten centimeters to several meters away. In addition the iris remains constant for a long time unless injuries occurone enrolment scan lasts for a lifetime. Although certain surgical and medical operations may affect the pretext and shape of the iris, its fine texture maintains stability for decades. Furthermore, it can still be used on blind people because the technology is not dependent on sight but on pattern. (Find Biometrics, n. d).ConclusionThe use of specialized databases in criminal justice system is a great move towards up(p) the effectiveness and efficiency of criminal identification. It is important that these databases be implemented crossways the globe for detecting and tracking down criminals, since the negative effects of these technologies are so meager, and easily solvable as compared to the over all positive impact.ReferencesFind Biometrics (n. d). Iris scanners and recognition. Retrieved fromhttp//www.findbiometrics.com/iris-recognition/Davis, M., & Weiss, J (2009). Facial recognition technology in fair play enforcement. Retrieved fromhttp//www.hendonpub.com/resources/articlearchive/details.aspx?ID=31Seaskate Inc. (1998). The evolution and development of police technology. Retrieved fromhttp//www.police-technology.net/id59.htmlTitanium (2010). Comparing face recognition against other types of biometric authenticationmethods. Retrieved fromhttp//www.titanium-tech.com/download/CompareBio.pdfReichert, K. (2001). Promising approaches to addressing crime use of information technologyin law enforcement. University of south Wales, Australia.Scherpenzeel, R. (2008). Key issues in introducing information technology in criminal justice.retieved from http//www.uncjin.org/other/korebo/chapter3.pdf